Facts, information and articles about Missouri Compromise, one of the causes of the civil war Missouri Compromise summary: The Missouri Compromise of was an effort by the U. Senate and House of Representatives to maintain a balance of power between the slaveholding states and free states. The slaveholding states feared that if they became outnumbered in Congressional representation that they would lack the power to protect their interests in property and trade.
The Missouri Compromise Henry Clay was first elected to the Senate inbefore his 30th birthday. This was against the rules set up in the Constitution that stipulated 30 as the youngest age for a Senator. Most white Americans agreed that western expansion was crucial to the health of the nation.
But what should be done about slavery in the West? The contradictions inherent in the expansion of white male voting rights can also be seen in problems raised by western migration.
The new western states were at the forefront of more inclusive voting rights for white men, but their development simultaneously devastated the rights of Native American communities. Native American rights rarely became a controversial public issue.
This was not the case for slavery, however, as northern and southern whites differed sharply about its proper role in the west.
The incorporation of new western territories into the United States made slavery an explicit concern of national politics. Balancing the interests of slave and free states had played a role from the very start of designing the federal government at the Constitutional Convention in The crucial compromise there that sacrificed the rights of African Americans in favor of a stronger union among the states exploded once more in when Missouri petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.
Inthe nation contained eleven free and eleven slave states creating a balance in the U. Missouri's entrance threatened to throw this parity in favor of slave interests.
The debate in Congress over the admission of Missouri was extraordinarily bitter after Congressman James Tallmadge from New York proposed that slavery be prohibited in the new state. The debate was especially sticky because defenders of slavery relied on a central principle of fairness.
How could the Congress deny a new state the right to decide for itself whether or not to allow slavery? If Congress controlled the decision, then the new states would have fewer rights than the original ones. Henry Clay, a leading congressman, played a crucial role in brokering a two-part solution known as the Missouri Compromise.
|Expert Answers||This blog is a place for civil discourse, critical thinking and new ideas. The goal of these entries is to challenge your current viewpoint and encourage the development of logical arguments.|
|If you like our content, please share it on social media!||But it was known that sooner or later Missouri was going to be seceded into the slave states.|
|Citation Information||It maintained its identity in relation to the opposition by a moderate and pragmatic advocacy of strict construction of the Constitution. Because it had competition, it could maintain discipline.|
|Missouri Compromise | Summary, Map, & Significance | plombier-nemours.com||Included are memoranda, journals, speeches, military records, land deeds, and miscellaneous printed matter, as well as correspondence. He said he wanted to have with me some conversation in relation to it, but it being a levee evening and much crowded no oppertunity was then had.|
First, Missouri would be admitted to the union as a slave state, but would be balanced by the admission of Maine, a free state, that had long wanted to be separated from Massachusetts.
Second, slavery was to be excluded from all new states in the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern boundary of Missouri. People on both sides of the controversy saw the compromise as deeply flawed. Nevertheless, it lasted for over thirty years until the Kansas-Nebraska Act of determined that new states north of the boundary deserved to be able to exercise their sovereignty in favor of slavery if they so choose.
Democracy and self-determination could clearly be mobilized to extend an unjust institution that contradicted a fundamental American commitment to equality. The Missouri crisis probed an enormously problematic area of American politics that would explode in a civil war.
As Thomas Jefferson observed about the Missouri crisis, "This momentous question, like a fire-bell in the night, awakened and filled me with terror.
African Americans obviously opposed slavery and news of some congressional opposition to its expansion circulated widely within slave communities. Denmark Vesey, a free black living in Charleston, South Carolina, made the most dramatic use of the white disagreement about the future of slavery in the west.
Vesey quoted the Bible as well as congressional debates over the Missouri issue to denounce slavery from the pulpit of the African Methodist Episcopal church where he was a lay minister.
Along with a key ally named Gullah Jack, Vesey organized a slave rebellion in that planned to capture the Charleston arsenal and seize the city long enough for its black population to escape to the free black republic of Haiti.
The rebellion was betrayed just days before its planned starting date and resulted in the execution of thirty-five organizers as well as the destruction of the black church where Vesey preached. Slaveholders were clearly on the defensive with antislavery sentiment building in the north and undeniable opposition among African Americans in the south.
As one white Charlestonian complained, "By the Missouri question, our slaves thought, there was a charter of liberties granted them by Congress.
The most explosive of these future black actions would be Nat Turner's Virginia slave revolt in Westward American Expansion This site offers a good summary of the beginning of westward American migration. Be sure to check out the maps found on the page showing various routes taken west.
There are also some useful links at the bottom to pages on other expansion-related topics such as Lewis and Clark and the Donner Party. The African Methodist Episcopal Church The site is an introduction to the African Methodist Episcopal Church, established in to protest racial segregation in the church.
Denmark Vesey, leader of a slave rebellion inwas a lay minister in the A. Be sure to read about the "Four Horsemen," the founders of the modern church, in the section entitled "Our History. There were a number of slave uprisings, some of which saw varying degrees of success.The Missouri Compromise was the legislation that provided for the admission to the United States of Maine as a free state along with Missouri as a slave state, thus maintaining the balance of power between North and South in the United States Senate.
President James Monroe's notes, February 13, , on the Missouri Compromise, "The idea was that if the whole arrangement, to this effect, could be secured, that it would be better to adopt it, than break the union.
Neither did Mr. Barbour, nor any other person alluded to, favor this, but to save the union, believing it to be in imminent danger.". President James Monroe's notes, February 13, , on the Missouri Compromise, "The idea was that if the whole arrangement, to this effect, could be secured, that it would be better to adopt it, than break the union.
Neither did Mr. Barbour, nor any other person alluded to, favor this, but to save the union, believing it to be in imminent danger.". Ultimately, that was all the Missouri Compromise was about.
Nobody wanted to rock the boat, nobody wanted to be that guy who accidentally destroyed the Union by forcing the slavery issue. It Sounded Like A Good Idea At The Time. Clay drew up a compromise: Missouri would be allowed into the Union and given the rights of self.
Find an answer to your question was the Slave Trade Compromise a good idea was the missouri compromise a good idea was The Three-Fifths Compromise a good idea w 1. Log in Join now 1. Log in Join now High School. History. 5 points Was the Slave Trade Compromise a good idea.
The Missouri Compromise was an agreement between the North and theSouth and passed by Congress in that allowed Missouri to beadmitted as the 24th state in One slave state (Missouri.