Consequences of banning smoking

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of anti-smoking legislation in public places and public support for smoking ban. Informed consent was obtained.

Consequences of banning smoking

Home 9 Pros and Cons of Smoking Bans 9 Pros and Cons of Smoking Bans Smoking bans are laws or policies that prevent people from smoking in workplaces, restaurants, coffee shops, and other kinds of public places.

Consequences of banning smoking

Smoking bans are common around the world and have been in place for years. The most common bans are those that prevent people from smoking in public areas, but there are certain countries that have put a total tobacco ban in place.

Bhutan, for example, forbids its people to grow, harvest, produce, and sell tobacco as well as tobacco products. However, there are also numerous people who are against these policies and consider them to be unfair.

To know more about this argument, learn about the pros and cons of smoking bans. List of Pros of Smoking Bans 1. They help protect the health of people.

As a result, people can eat at restaurants, enjoy a cup of coffee at coffee shops, and get into public transport without having to worry about their health. Many people argue that smoking bans can help smokers, too. These bans can make them more aware about the health risks of smoking and encourage them to quit.

They help lower healthcare costs. The positive financial effect of smoking bans extends beyond the personal level. They help in preventing fires. Smoking bans are put into place not just for health purposes but also for safety reasons.

By following smoking bans in places that have highly flammable materials, people can prevent fires from arising, destroying properties, and taking lives.

BBC NEWS | UK | Magazine | Unintended consequences of the smoking ban

As mentioned above, smoking bans can help reduce smoking-related illnesses. These, in turn, mean that less people would be absent at work due to these illnesses and that companies can maintain excellent productivity.

They help protect the environment. Cigarette butts, which are mostly non-biodegradable, can be harmful to the environment since they can clog water systems and leach dangerous chemicals into the ground and water table. Fortunately, when people follow smoking bans, there would be fewer cigarette butts and the environment can become cleaner and healthier.

List of Cons of Smoking Bans 1. They find this offensive because they believe that, since smoking is not a crime, the government nor anyone else should not have a say about what they do and limit their freedom. They are sometimes not effective. Implementing smoking bans also can be difficult at times.

Because of this, politicians usually have a hard time implementing smoking bans because they know it can impact their political futures. They reduce the amount of taxes that the government collects.


As a result, it has to make up by increasing the taxes of other products and making these goods more expensive than they already are. They can destroy businesses. Obviously, smoking bans can have a negative effect on tobacco farmers and cigarette manufacturers and sellers because their sales would inevitably plummet.

However, these policies can also have an impact on restaurants, coffee shops, and other places where people love to smoke. By implementing smoking bans, these businesses will lose many of their customers and earn less than they used to. Final Thoughts These are just some of the pros and cons of smoking bans.

Government officials, business owners, and ordinary citizens should weigh them carefully to decide if smoking bans are worth implementing or not. Apr 2, -Flow Psychology Editor.Goodman P, Agnew M, McCaffrey M, Paul G, Clancy L.


Effects of the Irish Smoking Ban on Respiratory Health of Bar Workers and Air Quality in Dublin Pubs. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine ;(8)–5 [cited May 12]. Sep 23,  · The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of anti-smoking legislation in public places and public support for smoking ban.

The study was conducted among individuals of whom (%) supported the general ban on smoking in public places. Non-smokers (%) agreed more than smokers that.

Smoking ban - Wikipedia

Consequences of Banning Smoking. It is five years since England became the last part of the UK to introduce legislation banning smoking in workplaces and enclosed public spaces. The aim was to reduce passive smoking, or exposure to secondhand smoke, which is known to be harmful.

consequences of banning smoking. Topics: Passive smoking, Smoking, Smoking ban Pages: 4 ( words) Published: January 9, The sight of employees smoking outdoors in all weathers is now commonplace. Smoking areas in bars, pubs, restaurants and hotels are long gone.

It is five years since England became the last part of the UK to. This chapter provides background information on smoking bans, including a brief discussion of the history of tobacco policies that led to bans and the current status of bans in the United States and globally.

Objective. To determine whether Lexington, Kentucky's smoke‐free law affected employment and business closures in restaurants and bars.

On 27 April , Lexington‐Fayette County implemented a comprehensive ordinance prohibiting smoking in all public buildings, including bars and restaurants.

Simon Clark - Taking Liberties - The consequences of a ban on smoking in outdoor eating areas