An analysis of the dilemma of the philosopher and the city by socrates

Synopsis of the Republic a.

An analysis of the dilemma of the philosopher and the city by socrates

It is in the form of a dialog between Socrates and Crito, an elderly Athenian who for many years has been a devoted friend of Socrates and a firm believer in his ethical teachings. The conversation takes place at an early hour on what proved to be the next-to-the-last day that Socrates remained alive.

Like both the Euthyphro and the Apology, this dialog reveals something of the character of Socrates by describing the manner in which he faced difficult circumstances without being overcome by them.

In the Crito, particular attention is given to the reasons advanced by Socrates for refusing to escape from prison as a means of saving his own life. The circumstances were such that he might easily have done so, and his friends were urging him to do it. The dialog begins with Socrates asking Crito why he has arrived at so early an hour.

The dawn is just beginning to break, and Socrates has been sleeping soundly throughout the night. He adds that he is astonished to find that Socrates has been able to sleep so well and to remain calm and peaceful when the time for his execution is so close at hand.

Socrates has been in prison for about a month, owing to the fact that no execution of a criminal would be allowed in the city until a certain ship has returned from the island of Delos. Crito reports that the ship is soon to arrive, for he has been told that it has left Sunium and is expected to be in Athens the next day.

For this reason, Crito tells Socrates that tomorrow will be his last day alive.

An analysis of the dilemma of the philosopher and the city by socrates

Socrates states that if such is the will of God, he is willing to die. However, he is convinced, because of a dream that he experienced that morning, that there will be a delay of one more day. At this point, Crito pleads with Socrates to take his advice and escape from prison.

He gives as his reason that if Socrates refuses to escape and is then put to death, Crito will not only have lost a true friend who can never be replaced, but he will also be censured by many persons who will accuse him of failure to do what he could in order to save the life of a friend.

It will be supposed by those who are not familiar with the facts that Crito could have purchased the freedom of his friend by paying a certain amount of money but that he refused to do so. Hence, if Socrates cares about the reputation of his friend in the future, he will act in accordance with the request that that friend is now making of him.

Socrates must admit that the opinion of the majority is something that cannot be ignored, for they are capable of inflicting great harm on anyone who has incurred their disapproval. Socrates is not concerned about the opinion of the majority, for it is capable of neither the greatest evil nor the greatest good.

It cannot make a man wise and it cannot make one foolish. Whatever it does is largely a matter of chance. Crito asks if Socrates does not fear that escaping from prison would cause his friends to get in trouble with the authorities of the land and that this might cause them to lose a portion of their property or possibly suffer something that might be even worse than that.

Socrates admits that he does have that fear, but it is by no means the only one that he has. Crito then tells him to have no such fear, for there are persons who at no great cost are willing to save him and bring him out of prison. As for the informers, they are far from being exorbitant in their demands, and a little money will satisfy them.

Crito explains that he has considerable means himself, all of which he would gladly use for any purpose that would aid in saving the life of Socrates.

Furthermore, if Socrates should feel hesitant about allowing Crito to spend so much in his behalf, there are many more of his friends who are ready and willing to supply whatever amount of money is needed for this purpose.

If these offers of assistance are not sufficient to persuade Socrates to attempt an escape from prison, Crito presents some additional reasons in support of what he has been urging him to do.Information Philosopher is dedicated to the new Information Philosophy, with explanations for Freedom, Values, and Knowledge.

Socrates, the Athenian philosopher ( B.C.) is in prison, waiting for his execution, after being found guilty of The main text of the dialogue is Socrates’ analysis of Crito’s arguments why he should escape from prison.

Socrates was wronged by the city and so he has no obligation to accept his penalty. Free, outspoken, and flourishing, let them live in the city of famous Athens.

Reviews of fiction books

Phaedra, Hippolytus, by Eurpides, lines , translated by David Kovacs, Loeb. The Argument For The Ontological Argument - For many, the idea of existence as a predicate causes issues for the ontological argument. In the argument Anselm states that God is a being, than which nothing greater can be conceived, and using logic he comes to .

The trial of Socrates ( BC) was held to determine the philosopher’s guilt of two charges: asebeia (impiety) against the pantheon of Athens, and corruption of the youth of the city-state; the accusers cited two impious acts by Socrates: “failing to acknowledge the gods that the city acknowledges” and “introducing new deities”..

The death sentence of Socrates was the legal. Analysis of Euthyphro Nikon PHI Bob Harris October 15, Analysis of Euthyphro Socrates was put to death in Athens for subverting the youth of the city.

He was indicted by Meletus and awaiting his trail on the porch of .

Socrates - Wikipedia